Categories
- Follow facedownphilosophy on WordPress.com
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Tag Archives: Alvin Plantinga
Using Philosophy of Science to Evaluate Claims in Philosophy of Religion
I offer this post as a tribute to my exceptionally well-spoken colleague at http://theologiansinc.wordpress.com/ Please excuse the “flat-earthed” numbskullery throughout the essay, but I think that you’ll find the treatment a bit more thorough than the last. 🙂 Yours In … Continue reading
Posted in Evolution, Philosophy, Psychology, Questions, Religion, Science
Tagged Alvin Plantinga, Cognition, Epistemological evolution, evolution, Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, falsifiability, falsification, Imre Lakatos, Karl Lorenz, Karl Popper, naturalism, Patricia Churchland, philosophy, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, progressive research program, religion, science, sophisticated methodological falsifiability, Where the Con
5 Comments
Evaluating Alvin Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
In Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism, Alvin Plantinga has argued that despite the assertions of the atheist and naturalist communities, science is not at odds with theism at all; that it is, in fact, naturalism that … Continue reading
Evaluating the skeptical theistic response to the problem of evil…
Ok, today’s post is a doozy! A lot of effort went in to it, so I hope you enjoy it. If you have anything to add, feel free to berate my cognitive abilities and slap me with a post. One … Continue reading
Posted in Announcements, Personal Life, Philosophy, Religion
Tagged Alvin Plantinga, argument from evil, Daniel Howard-Snyder, evil, faith, free-will, goodness, justification for evil, Michael Bergmann, Ockam's Razor, philosophy, philosophy of religion, problem of evil, reason, religion, skeptical, skeptical theist, theodicy, William Rowe
7 Comments